loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Bett; John A. S..The latest application filed is for "fuel cell having a corrosion resistant and protected cathode catalyst layer".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Fuel cell having a corrosion resistant and protected cathode catalyst layer Grant 6,855,453 - Bett , et al. February 15, 2 | 2005-02-15 |
Fuel cell having a corrosion resistant and protected cathode catalyst layer App 20040126644 - Bett, John A. S. ;   et al. | 2004-07-01 |
Porous carbon body for a fuel cell having an electronically conductive hydrophilic agent Grant 6,746,982 - Hertel , et al. June 8, 2 | 2004-06-08 |
Porous carbon body for a fuel cell having an electronically conductive hydrophilic agent App 20030124414 - Hertel, Christopher J. ;   et al. | 2003-07-03 |
Porous carbon body with increased wettability by water Grant 5,840,414 - Bett , et al. November 24, 1 | 1998-11-24 |
Steam reforming catalyst Grant 4,755,498 - Setzer , et al. July 5, 1 | 1988-07-05 |
Steam reforming utilizing iron oxide catalyst Grant 4,522,802 - Setzer , et al. June 11, 1 | 1985-06-11 |
Iron oxide catalyst for steam reforming Grant 4,451,578 - Setzer , et al. May 29, 1 | 1984-05-29 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.