loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Besev; Magnus.The latest application filed is for "antigenic respiratory syncytial virus polypeptides".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Thiol-containing cleave reagents and oxidative wash Grant 11,421,264 - Marma , et al. August 23, 2 | 2022-08-23 |
Antigenic Respiratory Syncytial Virus Polypeptides App 20210017237 - Nabel; Gary J. ;   et al. | 2021-01-21 |
Prodrugs comprising an GLP-1/glucagon dual agonist linker hyaluronic acid conjugate Grant 10,806,797 - Kadereit , et al. October 20, 2 | 2020-10-20 |
Prodrugs Comprising An Glp-1/glucagon Dual Agonist Linker Hyaluronic Acid Conjugate App 20180289822 - KADEREIT; Dieter ;   et al. | 2018-10-11 |
Sequestrants Of Advanced Glycation End Product (age) Precursors App 20180265613 - Holmes-Farley; Stephen Randall ;   et al. | 2018-09-20 |
Thiol-containing Cleave Reagents And Oxidative Wash App 20170211134 - Marma; Mong Sano ;   et al. | 2017-07-27 |
Main Chain Polyamines App 20170182087 - DHAL; Pradeep K. ;   et al. | 2017-06-29 |
Sequestrants Of Advanced Glycation End Product (age) Precursors App 20160024233 - HOLMES-FARLEY; Stephen Randall ;   et al. | 2016-01-28 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.