Berry; Martin
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Berry; Martin.The latest application filed is for "neuron regeneration".
- Berry; Martin - Birmingham GB
- Berry; Martin - Bakersfield CA
- Berry, Martin - Edgbaston GB
- Berry, Martin - London GB
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Neuron regeneration Grant 7,943,755 - Ahmed , et al. May 17, 2 | 2011-05-17 |
| Neuron Regeneration App 20080253989 - Ahmed; Zubair ; et al. | 2008-10-16 |
| Devices Containing Dna Encoding Neurotrophic Agents And Related Compositions And Methods App 20080152689 - Baird; Andrew ; et al. | 2008-06-26 |
| Golf assistance device Grant 7,229,365 - Berry June 12, 2 | 2007-06-12 |
| Golf assistance device App 20070072691 - Berry; Martin | 2007-03-29 |
| Devices containing DNA encoding neurotrophic agents and related compositions and methods App 20040138155 - Baird, Andrew ; et al. | 2004-07-15 |
| CNS neuroregenerative compositions and methods of use App 20030121064 - Logan, Ann ; et al. | 2003-06-26 |
| Compositions and methods for delivery of agents for neuronal regeneration and survival Grant 6,551,618 - Baird , et al. April 22, 2 | 2003-04-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 