Berger; Stephen
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Berger; Stephen.The latest application filed is for "testing voice-based office equipment for immunity to interference from wireless devices".
- Berger; Stephen - Georgetown TX
- Berger; Stephen - West Salem OH
- Berger, Stephen - Norcross GA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Testing Voice-Based Office Equipment For Immunity To Interference From Wireless Devices App 20130295856 - Talwar; Vivek ; et al. | 2013-11-07 |
| Testing voice-based office equipment for immunity to interference from wireless devices Grant 8,412,111 - Talwar , et al. April 2, 2 | 2013-04-02 |
| Two-Way Communication Device App 20110117975 - Dunn; William Frank ; et al. | 2011-05-19 |
| Testing voice-based office equipment for immunity to interference from wireless devices App 20070159199 - Talwar; Vivek ; et al. | 2007-07-12 |
| Drive mechanism for boring machine Grant 7,134,513 - Randall , et al. November 14, 2 | 2006-11-14 |
| Method and system for distributing services in a digital asset environment App 20050177616 - Addington, Timothy H. ; et al. | 2005-08-11 |
| SEC | 0001383697 | Berger Stephen |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 