Bengel; Thomas G.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Bengel; Thomas G..The latest application filed is for "method of decontaminating a pwr primary loop".
- Bengel; Thomas G. - Plum Borough PA
- Bengel; Thomas G. - Plum Boro PA
- Bengel; Thomas G. - Pittsburgh PA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method of decontaminating a PWR primary loop Grant 5,517,539 - Corpora , et al. May 14, 1 | 1996-05-14 |
| Crack propagation test specimen Grant 5,292,481 - Aspden , et al. March 8, 1 | 1994-03-08 |
| Alkaline-permanganate process Grant 5,278,743 - Bengel , et al. January 11, 1 | 1994-01-11 |
| Test specimen for evaluating crack propagation due to corrosion Grant 5,260,024 - Aspden , et al. November 9, 1 | 1993-11-09 |
| Temperature monitoring device and thermocouple assembly therefor Grant 5,061,083 - Grimm , et al. October 29, 1 | 1991-10-29 |
| System and method for cleaning the inner surface of tubular members Grant 5,046,289 - Bengel , et al. September 10, 1 | 1991-09-10 |
| Method for the electrolytic conditioning of metal tubes Grant 3,905,885 - Bengel , et al. September 16, 1 | 1975-09-16 |
| Seal Grant 3,759,662 - Bengel , et al. September 18, 1 | 1973-09-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 