Begun; Ralph M.

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Begun; Ralph M..The latest application filed is for "dynamically reconfiguring a primary processor identity within a multi-processor socket server".

Company Profile

0.16.6

Begun; Ralph M. - Raleigh NC US
Begun; Ralph M - Raleigh NC
Begun; Ralph M. - Boca Raton FL
Begun; Ralph M. - N/A

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Dynamically reconfiguring a primary processor identity within a multi-processor socket server Grant 8,819,484 - Begun , et al. August 26, 2	2014-08-26
Dynamically Reconfiguring A Primary Processor Identity Within A Multi-Processor Socket Server App 20130091380 - Decesaris; Michael ; et al.	2013-04-11
Authentication of I.sup.2C bus transactions Grant 8,032,745 - Bandholz , et al. October 4, 2	2011-10-04
Structure for securing leased resources on a computer Grant 8,028,069 - Bandholz , et al. September 27, 2	2011-09-27
Securing leased resources on a computer Grant 7,707,290 - Bandholz , et al. April 27, 2	2010-04-27
System management architecture for multi-node computer system Grant 7,487,222 - Begun , et al. February 3, 2	2009-02-03
Structure For Securing Leased Resources On A Computer App 20080263560 - BANDHOLZ; JUSTIN P. ; et al.	2008-10-23
Securing Leased Resources On A Computer App 20070260890 - Bandholz; Justin P. ; et al.	2007-11-08
Authentication of I C bus transactions App 20070143606 - Bandholz; Justin Potok ; et al.	2007-06-21
System management architecture for multi-node computer system App 20060224685 - Begun; Ralph M. ; et al.	2006-10-05
System for combining data from multiple CPU write requests via buffers and using read-modify-write operation to write the combined data to the memory Grant 5,459,842 - Begun , et al. October 17, 1	1995-10-17
Microcomputer system employing address offset mechanism to increase the supported cache memory capacity Grant 5,450,559 - Begun , et al. September 12, 1	1995-09-12
Data processing apparatus for selectively posting write cycles using the 82385 cache controller Grant 5,327,545 - Begun , et al. * July 5, 1	1994-07-05
Computer, non-maskable interrupt trace routine override Grant 5,307,482 - Bealkowski , et al. April 26, 1	1994-04-26
Dual bus microcomputer system with programmable control of lock function Grant 5,182,809 - Begun , et al. January 26, 1	1993-01-26
Delayed cache write enable circuit for a dual bus microcomputer system with an 80386 and 82385 Grant 5,175,826 - Begun , et al. December 29, 1	1992-12-29
Data processing system with means to convert burst operations into memory pipelined operations Grant 5,146,582 - Begun September 8, 1	1992-09-08
Control of pipelined operation in a microcomputer system employing dynamic bus sizing with 80386 processor and 82385 cache controller Grant 5,125,084 - Begun , et al. June 23, 1	1992-06-23
Microcomputer system including a microprocessor reset circuit Grant 5,109,506 - Begun April 28, 1	1992-04-28
Method and apparatus for selectively posting write cycles using the 82385 cache controller Grant 5,045,998 - Begun , et al. September 3, 1	1991-09-03

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.