loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Bazyn; Timothy.The latest application filed is for "ducted combustion systems utilizing outside air injection".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Ducted combustion systems utilizing duct structures Grant 9,803,538 - Anders , et al. October 31, 2 | 2017-10-31 |
Ducted combustion systems utilizing tubular ducts Grant 9,587,606 - Anders , et al. March 7, 2 | 2017-03-07 |
Ducted Combustion Systems Utilizing Tubular Ducts App 20160298583 - Anders; Jonathan ;   et al. | 2016-10-13 |
Ducted Combustion Systems Utilizing Duct Structures App 20160298529 - Anders; Jonathan ;   et al. | 2016-10-13 |
Ducted Combustion Systems Utilizing Outside Air Injection App 20160298584 - Svensson; Kenth ;   et al. | 2016-10-13 |
Combustion Engine and Method of Use Resulting in Reduced Soot Emissions App 20150211413 - Evans; Ian ;   et al. | 2015-07-30 |
Compression ignition engine having fuel system for non-sooting combustion and method Grant 8,869,770 - Bazyn , et al. October 28, 2 | 2014-10-28 |
Compression Ignition Engine Having Fuel System For Non-Sooting Combustion And Method App 20120318233 - Bazyn; Timothy ;   et al. | 2012-12-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.