Basch; E. Evert
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Basch; E. Evert.The latest application filed is for "dqpsk/dpsk optical receiver with tunable optical filters".
- Basch; E. Evert - Stow MA US
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| DQPSK/DPSK optical receiver with tunable optical filters Grant 8,412,054 - Chen , et al. April 2, 2 | 2013-04-02 |
| Dqpsk/dpsk Optical Receiver With Tunable Optical Filters App 20110286740 - CHEN; David Zhi ; et al. | 2011-11-24 |
| DQPSK/DPSK optical receiver with tunable optical fibers Grant 8,032,036 - Chen , et al. October 4, 2 | 2011-10-04 |
| Dqpsk/dpsk Optical Receiver With Tunable Optical Fibers App 20090148171 - Chen; David Zhi ; et al. | 2009-06-11 |
| Variable Photonic Coupler App 20080144996 - Basch; E. Evert ; et al. | 2008-06-19 |
| Variable photonic coupler Grant 7,389,019 - Basch , et al. June 17, 2 | 2008-06-17 |
| Method and system for transmission of video in an asynchronous transfer mode network Grant 6,108,382 - Gringeri , et al. August 22, 2 | 2000-08-22 |
| Fault locating system for optical telecommunications Grant 4,184,056 - Basch , et al. January 15, 1 | 1980-01-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 