Bartz, Kenneth W.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Bartz, Kenneth W..The latest application filed is for "polymer system for thick polymer sheets including syndiotactic polyoropylene or poly-1-butene".
- Bartz, Kenneth W. - Baytown TX
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Polymer system for thick polymer sheets including syndiotactic polyoropylene or poly-1-butene App 20030224194 - Howell, George D. ; et al. | 2003-12-04 |
| Polyolefin-acrylic bonded composite Grant 5,401,581 - Bartz , et al. March 28, 1 | 1995-03-28 |
| Plastomer compatibilized polyethylene/polypropylene blends Grant 5,266,392 - Land , et al. November 30, 1 | 1993-11-30 |
| UV Stabilizer system and UV stabilized polyolefins Grant 4,487,870 - Bartz December 11, 1 | 1984-12-11 |
| Copper adhesive composition Grant 4,255,533 - Bartz March 10, 1 | 1981-03-10 |
| Thermoplastic adhesive compositions Grant 3,987,122 - Bartz , et al. * October 19, 1 | 1976-10-19 |
| Process for controlling rheology of C.sub.3 + polyolefins Grant 3,898,209 - Watson , et al. August 5, 1 | 1975-08-05 |
| Thermoplastic adhesive compositions Grant 3,868,433 - Bartz , et al. February 25, 1 | 1975-02-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 