Bartley; Bradley E.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Bartley; Bradley E..The latest application filed is for "two wire intensified common rail fuel system".
- Bartley; Bradley E. - Pekin IL
- Bartley; Bradley E. - Manito IL
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Two wire intensified common rail fuel system Grant 7,980,224 - Lewis , et al. July 19, 2 | 2011-07-19 |
| Tappet assembly Grant 7,748,359 - Bartley , et al. July 6, 2 | 2010-07-06 |
| System for selectively increasing fuel pressure in a fuel injection system Grant 7,578,283 - Bartley August 25, 2 | 2009-08-25 |
| Two wire intensified common rail fuel system App 20090194072 - Lewis; Stephen R. ; et al. | 2009-08-06 |
| High pressure pump and method of reducing fluid mixing within same App 20090114190 - Shafer; Scott ; et al. | 2009-05-07 |
| High-pressure pump Grant 7,451,741 - Bartley , et al. November 18, 2 | 2008-11-18 |
| Tappet assembly App 20080006233 - Bartley; Bradley E. ; et al. | 2008-01-10 |
| Engine having a high pressure hydraulic system and low pressure lubricating system Grant 6,067,962 - Bartley , et al. May 30, 2 | 2000-05-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 