loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Baniak; Grzegorz.The latest application filed is for "power drive mechanism for a motor vehicle liftgate having a disengageable gear train".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Instrument panel register Grant D603,493 - Fraser , et al. November 3, 2 | 2009-11-03 |
Power drive mechanism for a motor vehicle liftgate having a disengageable gear train Grant 6,962,023 - Daniels , et al. November 8, 2 | 2005-11-08 |
Power drive mechanism for a motor vehicle liftgate having a disengageable gear train App 20040177559 - Daniels, Andrew R. ;   et al. | 2004-09-16 |
Power drive mechanism for a motor vehicle liftgate having a disengageable gear train Grant 6,711,855 - Daniels , et al. March 30, 2 | 2004-03-30 |
Hood latch with self-retracting secondary latch release arm Grant 6,666,483 - Baniak , et al. December 23, 2 | 2003-12-23 |
Hood latch with self-retracting secondary latch release arm App 20030122382 - Baniak, Grzegorz ;   et al. | 2003-07-03 |
Vehicle hood latch with retracting secondary release arm Grant 6,109,670 - Tomaszewski , et al. August 29, 2 | 2000-08-29 |
Vehicle door latch with reduced release effort Grant 5,941,579 - Baniak August 24, 1 | 1999-08-24 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.