Baker; Daniel D.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Baker; Daniel D..The latest application filed is for "apparatus and method for handling linerless label tape".
- Baker; Daniel D. - St. Paul MN
- Baker, Daniel D - St. Paul MN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Apparatus and method for handling linerless label tape Grant 7,220,071 - Baker , et al. May 22, 2 | 2007-05-22 |
| Apparatus and method for handling linerless label tape App 20050186009 - Baker, Daniel D. ; et al. | 2005-08-25 |
| Apparatus and method for handling linerless label tape Grant 6,910,820 - Baker , et al. June 28, 2 | 2005-06-28 |
| Apparatus and method for handling linerless label tape App 20050019081 - Baker, Daniel D. ; et al. | 2005-01-27 |
| System for printing and applying tape onto surfaces App 20020057300 - Baker, Daniel D ; et al. | 2002-05-16 |
| Continuous tape supply system including a tape splicing mechanism for use with box taping machines Grant 5,624,526 - Perecman , et al. April 29, 1 | 1997-04-29 |
| Box sealing machine with tape applicator sensor system Grant 5,507,907 - Kropp , et al. April 16, 1 | 1996-04-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 