loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Bailey; Robert W..The latest application filed is for "diverter assembly with integral water-hammer arrestor".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Diverter assembly with integral water-hammer arrestor Grant 6,904,927 - Bailey June 14, 2 | 2005-06-14 |
Diverter assembly with integral water-hammer arrestor App 20040173259 - Bailey, Robert W. | 2004-09-09 |
Battery case Grant D488,443 - Bailey April 13, 2 | 2004-04-13 |
Battery case Grant D483,722 - Bailey December 16, 2 | 2003-12-16 |
Shroud Grant D482,665 - Bailey November 25, 2 | 2003-11-25 |
Laparoscopic surgery instrumentation and method of its use Grant 6,120,513 - Bailey , et al. September 19, 2 | 2000-09-19 |
Irrigating laparoscopic cannula Grant 6,017,333 - Bailey January 25, 2 | 2000-01-25 |
Compression cartridge for a faucet valve assembly Grant 5,669,407 - Bailey September 23, 1 | 1997-09-23 |
Irrigating laparoscopic cannula or trocar Grant 5,458,633 - Bailey October 17, 1 | 1995-10-17 |
Abdominal cavity organ retractor Grant 5,271,385 - Bailey December 21, 1 | 1993-12-21 |
SEC | 0001327300 | Bailey Robert W |
SEC | 0001091162 | BAILEY ROBERT W |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.