Avlonitis; Artie
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Avlonitis; Artie.The latest application filed is for "blind mate optoelectronic device".
- Avlonitis; Artie - San Jose CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Blind Mate Optoelectronic Device App 20130308912 - Avlonitis; Artie ; et al. | 2013-11-21 |
| Chassis for front and back inserted modules Grant 6,847,528 - Sucharczuk , et al. January 25, 2 | 2005-01-25 |
| Chassis with modular repositionable optical feedthrough plates Grant 6,719,382 - Sucharczuk , et al. April 13, 2 | 2004-04-13 |
| Connector mounting with pass-through slot and diverging angle facet Grant 6,709,284 - Avlonitis March 23, 2 | 2004-03-23 |
| Chassis with repositionable plates App 20030132685 - Sucharczuk, Guy ; et al. | 2003-07-17 |
| Chassis for front and back inserted modules App 20030031003 - Sucharczuk, Guy ; et al. | 2003-02-13 |
| Chassis for front and back inserted modules Grant 6,498,732 - Sucharczuk , et al. December 24, 2 | 2002-12-24 |
| Chassis with repositionable plates App 20020079791 - Sucharczuk, Guy ; et al. | 2002-06-27 |
| Chassis for front and back inserted modules App 20020080589 - Sucharczuk, Guy ; et al. | 2002-06-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 