Avexa L T D
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Avexa L T D. Avexa L T D has 3 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "AVEXITE"
- Company Aliases
- AVEXA LIMITED
- AVEXA LIMITED - Richmond,Victoria AU
- AVEXA LIMITED - Richmond AU
- AVEXA LIMITED - Richmond (Victoria) AU
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| APRICITABINE AND PI COMBINATION THERAPY 20140315936 - 14/359023 Coates; Jonathan Alan Victor ; et al. | 2014-10-23 |
| COMPOUNDS HAVING ANTIVIRAL PROPERTIES 20130059865 - 13/614049 Deadman; John Joseph ; et al. | 2013-03-07 |
| Bicyclic pyrimidinones and uses thereof 20120232035 - 13/405511 Jones; Eric Dale ; et al. | 2012-09-13 |
| IMIDAZOPYRIMIDINES AND USES THEREOF 20110028487 - 12/734042 Deadman; John Joseph ; et al. | 2011-02-03 |
| BICYCLIC PYRIMIDINONES AND USES THEREOF 20110009366 - 12/766510 Jones; Eric Dale ; et al. | 2011-01-13 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"AVEXITE" 3799729 79069246 |
AVEXITE 2009-04-21 |
"AVEXA" 3344402 79023848 |
AVEXA 2006-03-07 |
"AVEXITE" 78761772 |
AVEXITE 2005-11-28 |
| SEC | 0001363828 | Avexa Ltd |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 