loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for AuClair; Christopher J..The latest application filed is for "self configuring network/printer system".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Self configuring network/printer system Grant 5,659,670 - AuClair August 19, 1 | 1997-08-19 |
Enabling features over common communication channel Grant 5,442,541 - Hube , et al. August 15, 1 | 1995-08-15 |
Toner compositions containing negative charge enhancing additives Grant 4,480,021 - Lu , et al. October 30, 1 | 1984-10-30 |
Toner compositions containing polyanhydride resins Grant 4,442,189 - Lu , et al. April 10, 1 | 1984-04-10 |
Emulsion polymerization process for dry positive toner compositions employs charge control agent as wetting agent Grant 4,299,903 - AuClair , et al. November 10, 1 | 1981-11-10 |
Polyblend coated carrier materials Grant 4,297,427 - Williams , et al. October 27, 1 | 1981-10-27 |
Method of using electrostatographic toner composition with surfactant Grant 4,198,477 - Williams , et al. April 15, 1 | 1980-04-15 |
Electrostatographic toner composition containing surfactant Grant 4,139,483 - Williams , et al. February 13, 1 | 1979-02-13 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.