Au-Yeung; Patrick Ho Sing
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Au-Yeung; Patrick Ho Sing.The latest application filed is for "process for the production of high purity glycol esters".
- Au-Yeung; Patrick Ho Sing - Midland MI
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Process for the production of high purity glycol esters Grant 9,481,629 - Merenov , et al. November 1, 2 | 2016-11-01 |
| Process for separating one or more aliphatic diamines from reductive amination reaction solvents and impurities Grant 9,187,403 - Santhany , et al. November 17, 2 | 2015-11-17 |
| Process For The Production Of High Purity Glycol Esters App 20150274635 - Merenov; Andrei S. ; et al. | 2015-10-01 |
| Processes for the production of hydrofluoroolefins Grant 8,933,280 - Tirtowidjojo , et al. January 13, 2 | 2015-01-13 |
| Processes For The Production Of Chlorinated And/or Fluorinated Propenes And Higher Alkenes App 20140031595 - Tirtowidjojo; Max Markus ; et al. | 2014-01-30 |
| Process For Separating One Or More Aliphatic Diamines From Reductive Amination Reaction Solvents And Impurities App 20120116123 - Santhany; Stacie ; et al. | 2012-05-10 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 