AT&T IP I, LP
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for AT&T IP I, LP.The latest application filed is for "system and method for managing conditional access blackout events in a video data distribution system".
- AT&T IP I, LP - Atlanta GA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| System and method for managing conditional access blackout events in a video data distribution system Grant 8,245,263 - Sofos , et al. August 14, 2 | 2012-08-14 |
| System and method for verifying a conditional access blackout in a video data distribution system Grant 8,239,908 - Sofos , et al. August 7, 2 | 2012-08-07 |
| System and method for distributing video data over an electrical power line Grant 8,212,883 - Wilson , et al. July 3, 2 | 2012-07-03 |
| Method and system for multicasting targeted advertising data Grant 8,213,426 - Zampiello July 3, 2 | 2012-07-03 |
| System and method for presenting prioritized advertising data during execution of video trick play command data Grant 8,145,524 - Cansler , et al. March 27, 2 | 2012-03-27 |
| DSL video service with memory manager Grant 8,086,093 - Stuckman December 27, 2 | 2011-12-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 