Ashizawa; Naoki
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ashizawa; Naoki.The latest application filed is for "novel bisphosphonic acid compound".
- Ashizawa; Naoki - Saitama JP
- ASHIZAWA; Naoki - Saitama-shi JP
- Ashizawa; Naoki - Kamifukuoka JP
- Ashizawa, Naoki - Kamifukuoka-shi JP
- Ashizawa; Naoki - Hamura JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Bisphosphonic acid compound Grant 10,689,408 - Kobashi , et al. | 2020-06-23 |
| Novel Bisphosphonic Acid Compound App 20190002482 - KOBASHI; Seiichi ; et al. | 2019-01-03 |
| Phenol derivative Grant 8,367,843 - Kobashi , et al. February 5, 2 | 2013-02-05 |
| Novel Phenol Derivative App 20120184587 - Kobashi; Seiichi ; et al. | 2012-07-19 |
| 1 2 4-triazole compound Grant 7,074,816 - Nakamura , et al. July 11, 2 | 2006-07-11 |
| Novel 1 2 4-triazole compound App 20050004175 - Nakamura, Hiroshi ; et al. | 2005-01-06 |
| Pyrazole derivatives and COX inhibitors containing them Grant 6,136,831 - Aotsuka , et al. October 24, 2 | 2000-10-24 |
| 2-substituted benzothiazole derivatives and prophylactic and therapeutic agents for the treatment of diabetic complications Grant 5,700,819 - Aotsuka , et al. December 23, 1 | 1997-12-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 