Armstrong; William W.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Armstrong; William W..The latest application filed is for "method and apparatus for estimating odor concentration using an electronic nose".
- Armstrong; William W. - Edmonton CA
- Armstrong; William W. - Mill Neck NY
- Armstrong; William W. - St. Laurent Quebec CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method and apparatus for estimating odor concentration using an electronic nose Grant 6,411,905 - Guoliang , et al. June 25, 2 | 2002-06-25 |
| Sulfonamide compositions Grant 4,303,643 - Armstrong December 1, 1 | 1981-12-01 |
| Tetracycline antibiotic compositions Grant 4,126,680 - Armstrong * November 21, 1 | 1978-11-21 |
| Doxycycline compositions Grant 4,086,332 - Armstrong * April 25, 1 | 1978-04-25 |
| Tetracycline compositions Grant 4,081,528 - Armstrong * March 28, 1 | 1978-03-28 |
| Chlortetracycline compositions Grant 4,081,527 - Armstrong , et al. * March 28, 1 | 1978-03-28 |
| Oxytetracycline compositions Grant 4,018,889 - Armstrong April 19, 1 | 1977-04-19 |
| Trainable Digital Apparatus Grant 3,613,084 - Armstrong October 12, 1 | 1971-10-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 