loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Armstrong; Darrell J..The latest application filed is for "dynamic range extension techniques for a wavefront sensor including use in ophthalmic measurement".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Wavelength-doubling optical parametric oscillator Grant 7,248,397 - Armstrong , et al. July 24, 2 | 2007-07-24 |
Self-seeding ring optical parametric oscillator Grant 6,980,354 - Smith , et al. December 27, 2 | 2005-12-27 |
Image-rotating, 4-mirror, ring optical parametric oscillator Grant 6,775,054 - Smith , et al. August 10, 2 | 2004-08-10 |
Dynamic range extension techniques for a wavefront sensor including use in ophthalmic measurement App 20030193647 - Neal, Daniel R. ;   et al. | 2003-10-16 |
Dynamic range extension techniques for a wavefront sensor including use in ophthalmic measurement Grant 6,550,917 - Neal , et al. April 22, 2 | 2003-04-22 |
Apparatus and method for evaluating a target larger than a measuring aperture of a sensor Grant 6,184,974 - Neal , et al. February 6, 2 | 2001-02-06 |
Apparatus and method for characterizing pulsed light beams Grant 6,052,180 - Neal , et al. April 18, 2 | 2000-04-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.