loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Arikawa; Toshiaki.The latest application filed is for "packet switch scheduling apparatus with output schedulers and input schedulers performing scheduling processes separately".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Optical transmission switching device Grant 7,609,728 - Arikawa , et al. October 27, 2 | 2009-10-27 |
Multiplex communication system and method Grant 7,372,804 - Arikawa , et al. May 13, 2 | 2008-05-13 |
Packet switch scheduling apparatus with output schedulers and input schedulers performing scheduling processes separately App 20070223457 - Arikawa; Toshiaki ;   et al. | 2007-09-27 |
Multi-layer class identifying communication apparatus with priority control Grant 7,130,903 - Masuda , et al. October 31, 2 | 2006-10-31 |
Optical transmission switching device App 20060072923 - Arikawa; Toshiaki ;   et al. | 2006-04-06 |
Packet scheduling device Grant 6,754,215 - Arikawa , et al. June 22, 2 | 2004-06-22 |
Multiplex communication system and method App 20030133712 - Arikawa, Toshiaki ;   et al. | 2003-07-17 |
Multi-layer class identifying communication apparatus with priority control App 20010007560 - Masuda, Michio ;   et al. | 2001-07-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.