Applied Microwave Plasma Concepts, Inc.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Applied Microwave Plasma Concepts, Inc..The latest application filed is for "coaxial microwave applicator for an electron cyclotron resonance plasma source".
- Applied Microwave Plasma Concepts, Inc. - La Jolla CA
- Applied Microwave Plasma Concepts, Inc. - San Marcos CA
- Applied Microwave Plasma Concepts, Inc. - Carlsbad CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Coaxial microwave applicator for an electron cyclotron resonance plasma source Grant 5,707,452 - Dandl January 13, 1 | 1998-01-13 |
| Electron cyclotron resonance plasma source and method of operation Grant 5,370,765 - Dandl * December 6, 1 | 1994-12-06 |
| Method of operation of electron cyclotron resonance plasma source Grant 5,203,960 - Dandl April 20, 1 | 1993-04-20 |
| Electron cyclotron resonance plasma source Grant 5,133,826 - Dandl July 28, 1 | 1992-07-28 |
| Method and apparatus for producing intense microwave pulses Grant 5,003,225 - Dandl * March 26, 1 | 1991-03-26 |
| Method and apparatus for producing microwave radiation Grant 4,733,133 - Dandl March 22, 1 | 1988-03-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 