APLIX RESEARCH, INC.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for APLIX RESEARCH, INC..The latest application filed is for "systems and methods for document analytics".
- APLIX RESEARCH, INC. - Gaithersburg MD
- Aplix Research, Inc. - Gaitherburg MD
Trademarks
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Systems and methods for document analytics Grant 10,565,240 - Ching Feb | 2020-02-18 |
| Systems And Methods For Document Analytics App 20190171658 - Ching; Philip Wai-Sin | 2019-06-06 |
| Systems and methods for document analytics Grant 10,198,500 - Ching Fe | 2019-02-05 |
| Systems And Methods For Document Analytics App 20180203928 - Ching; Philip Wai-Sin | 2018-07-19 |
| Systems and methods for document analytics Grant 9,916,383 - Ching March 13, 2 | 2018-03-13 |
| System and method for independent verification and validation Grant 8,543,620 - Ching September 24, 2 | 2013-09-24 |
| Hierarchical document cross-reference system and method Grant 6,978,420 - Ching December 20, 2 | 2005-12-20 |
| Hierarchical document comparison system and method Grant 6,560,620 - Ching May 6, 2 | 2003-05-06 |
| NCAGE Code | 3CC83 | APLIX RESEARCH INC |
| CAGE Code | 3CC83 | APLIX RESEARCH INC |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 