Anjali; Anjali
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Anjali; Anjali.The latest application filed is for "scaling private application access support per client".
- Anjali; Anjali - Sunnyvale CA
- Anjali; Anjali - Burnaby CA
- Anjali; Anjali - Punjab IN
- Anjali; Anjali - Kapurthala IN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Maintaining dual-party authentication requirements for data retention compliance Grant 11,341,230 - Ponnuswamy , et al. May 24, 2 | 2022-05-24 |
| Scaling private application access support per client App 20220029965 - Chanak; John A. ; et al. | 2022-01-27 |
| Securing cluster communications in a non-secure network Grant 11,108,540 - Ponnuswamy , et al. August 31, 2 | 2021-08-31 |
| Web client authentication and authorization Grant 11,100,209 - Anjali , et al. August 24, 2 | 2021-08-24 |
| Web Client Authentication And Authorization App 20210049253 - Anjali; Anjali ; et al. | 2021-02-18 |
| Securing Cluster Communications In a Non-Secure Network App 20200235907 - Ponnuswamy; Senthilkumar ; et al. | 2020-07-23 |
| Web client authentication and authorization Grant 10,521,581 - Anjali , et al. Dec | 2019-12-31 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 