Trademark applications and grants for Andritz Technology And Asset Management Gmbh. Andritz Technology And Asset Management Gmbh has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "CONTIPRESS"
State Incorporated | No Place Where Organized Found |
Entity Type | UNKNOWN |
Address | STATTEGGER STRASSE 18 A-8045 GRAZ AUSTRIA |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Method for Reducing Nitrogen Oxides In Strip Heat Treatment Furnaces 20210080102 - 16/630538 Borrel; Pierre-Jerome ;   et al. | 2021-03-18 |
Method for Reducing Nitrogen Oxides In Strip Treatment Furnaces 20210079494 - 16/630533 Borrel; Pierre-Jerome ;   et al. | 2021-03-18 |
Method and Furnace Installation for Heat Treating Metal Strip 20190119777 - 16/092982 BORREL; Pierre-Jerome ;   et al. | 2019-04-25 |
Method for Producing Salts With a Reduced Water of Crystallisation Content 20190063836 - 16/170263 Krohl; Paul Bernhard | 2019-02-28 |
SCREW CENTRIFUGE FOR WET MECHANICAL SEPARATION OF SOLIDS 20170304846 - 15/494853 Klimenta; Stefan ;   et al. | 2017-10-26 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "CONTIPRESS" 2595668 76143113 |
CONTIPRESS 2000-10-06 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.