Andreas Stihl Ag Co Kg
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Andreas Stihl Ag Co Kg. Andreas Stihl Ag Co Kg has 53 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "STIHL"
- Company Aliases
- Andreas Stihl AG & Co. KG
- ANDREAS STIHL AG & CO KG
- Andreas Stihl AG & Co. KG
- Andreas Stihl AG & Co. KG - Waiblingen DE
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| EXHAUST MUFFLER, TWO-STROKE ENGINE OR FOUR-STROKE ENGINE HAVING AN EXHAUST MUFFLER, AND CATALYTIC CONVERTER FOR AN EXHAUST MUFFLER 20220305440 - 17/707632 Kunert; Niels ; et al. | 2022-09-29 |
| HANDHELD PORTABLE CUTTING APPARATUS HAVING A CUTTER UNIT 20220297211 - 17/835757 Mang; Harald ; et al. | 2022-09-22 |
| Hand- guided work apparatus 20220288765 - 17/687269 Mandel; Roland ; et al. | 2022-09-15 |
| Guard for an Intake Channel or Blow Channel of a Power Tool and Power Tool with such a Guard 20220260087 - 17/592614 Seiz; Jonathan ; et al. | 2022-08-18 |
| Battery Pack for Exchangeable Insertion into a Receiving Compartment 20220255155 - 17/584574 Henzler; Andreas ; et al. | 2022-08-11 |
| NCAGE Code | D0103 | ANDREAS STIHL AG & CO. KG |
| CAGE Code | D0103 | ANDREAS STIHL AG & CO. KG |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 