loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Anderson; Danny.The latest application filed is for "laser aiming device".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Laser aiming device Grant 9,134,094 - Hilbourne , et al. September 15, 2 | 2015-09-15 |
Modular sighting and lighting system for handguns Grant 8,915,009 - Caulk , et al. December 23, 2 | 2014-12-23 |
Electrical connector crimping plier tool Grant 8,739,594 - Anderson June 3, 2 | 2014-06-03 |
Laser device Grant D696,376 - Anderson , et al. December 24, 2 | 2013-12-24 |
Laser device Grant D694,847 - Anderson , et al. December 3, 2 | 2013-12-03 |
Laser Grant D694,848 - Anderson , et al. December 3, 2 | 2013-12-03 |
Laser device Grant D692,518 - Anderson , et al. October 29, 2 | 2013-10-29 |
Dual laser device Grant D689,162 - Hilbourne , et al. September 3, 2 | 2013-09-03 |
Laser Aiming Device App 20130185982 - Hilbourne; Zachary ;   et al. | 2013-07-25 |
Electrical Connector Crimping Plier Tool App 20130067983 - Anderson; Danny | 2013-03-21 |
Modular Sighting And Lighting System For Handguns App 20120124885 - Caulk; Michael J. ;   et al. | 2012-05-24 |
NCAGE Code | 1Q044 | ANDERSON DANNY |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.