loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for An; Young Gyu.The latest application filed is for "motor and rotor thereof".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Motor and rotor thereof Grant 9,419,482 - Lee , et al. August 16, 2 | 2016-08-16 |
Motor and rotor thereof Grant 9,048,712 - Lee , et al. June 2, 2 | 2015-06-02 |
Circuit breaker with arc extinguishing mechanism Grant 8,772,665 - An July 8, 2 | 2014-07-08 |
Motor And Rotor Thereof App 20130187486 - Lee; Jae Young ;   et al. | 2013-07-25 |
Motor And Rotor Thereof App 20130187506 - LEE; Jae Young ;   et al. | 2013-07-25 |
Mold cased circuit breaker Grant 8,390,406 - An March 5, 2 | 2013-03-05 |
Circuit Breaker With Arc Extinguishing Mechanism App 20120211469 - AN; Young Gyu | 2012-08-23 |
Bistable permanent magnetic actuator Grant 8,237,527 - An August 7, 2 | 2012-08-07 |
Bistable Permanent Magnetic Actuator App 20110304417 - AN; Young Gyu | 2011-12-15 |
Mold Cased Circuit Breaker App 20110297649 - AN; Young Gyu | 2011-12-08 |
Earth anchor bracket having saw-toothed and curved part Grant 7,985,038 - Kwon , et al. July 26, 2 | 2011-07-26 |
Earth Anchor Bracket Having Saw-toothed And Curved Part App 20100322718 - Kwon; Jung-Am ;   et al. | 2010-12-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.