Trademark applications and grants for Amrad Operations Pty L T D. Amrad Operations Pty L T D has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "QUANTI-D"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Method of Treating Cancer Comprising a Vegf-B Antgonist 20080260729 - 11/659179 Nash; Andrew ;   et al. | 2008-10-23 |
Modulating cytokine or hormone signalling in an animal comprising up-regulating the expression of SOCS sequence in the animal 20080009447 - 11/825986 Nash; Andrew ;   et al. | 2008-01-10 |
Nucleic acid encoding alpha chain of human IL-11 receptor 20060051842 - 11/204563 Hilton; Douglas James | 2006-03-09 |
Monoclonal antibody against Interleukin-13 receptor alpha 1 (IL-13Ralpha1) 20050058645 - 10/850270 Dunlop, Felicity Meredith ;   et al. | 2005-03-17 |
Method of modulating fertility in animals 20040043000 - 10/659200 Robb, Lorraine Grace ;   et al. | 2004-03-04 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
"QUANTI-D" 2266598 75434480 |
QUANTI-D 1998-02-13 |
"I-SPY" 2216129 75359618 |
I-SPY 1997-09-19 |
NCAGE Code | S8591 | AMRAD OPERATIONS PTY LTD |
CAGE Code | S8591 | AMRAD OPERATIONS PTY LTD |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.