American Prosthetic Components, Inc.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for American Prosthetic Components, Inc..The latest application filed is for "device for angularly coupling prosthetic components".
- American Prosthetic Components, Inc. - Green Bay WI
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Device for angularly coupling prosthetic components Grant 7,946,782 - Curtis May 24, 2 | 2011-05-24 |
| Prosthetic foot with a processor to manage energy return of adjustable heel and keel springs Grant 7,766,974 - Curtis August 3, 2 | 2010-08-03 |
| Prosthetic foot with heel and keel springs Grant 7,763,082 - Curtis July 27, 2 | 2010-07-27 |
| Offset alignment device Grant D620,594 - Curtis July 27, 2 | 2010-07-27 |
| Four hole offset alignment device Grant 7,267,695 - Curtis September 11, 2 | 2007-09-11 |
| Limb with modular prosthetic components Grant 7,189,264 - Curtis March 13, 2 | 2007-03-13 |
| Device for angularly coupling prosthetic components Grant 7,097,666 - Curtis August 29, 2 | 2006-08-29 |
| Device for offsetting prosthetic components Grant 7,090,700 - Curtis August 15, 2 | 2006-08-15 |
| Three prong adapter Grant 6,981,992 - Curtis January 3, 2 | 2006-01-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 