Ambroise; Stephane

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ambroise; Stephane.The latest application filed is for "an unstacker device with a vision system".

Company Profile

1.13.13

Ambroise; Stephane - Serves sur Rhone FR
Ambroise; Stephane - Serves FR
Ambroise; Stephane - Tain l'Hermitage FR
Ambroise; Stephane - Valence FR

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Unstacker device with a vision system Grant 10,214,369 - El Bernoussi , et al. Feb	2019-02-26
An Unstacker Device With A Vision System App 20180148281 - EL BERNOUSSI; Hicham ; et al.	2018-05-31
Storage module with stacking and unstacking functions Grant 9,611,112 - Campagnolle , et al. April 4, 2	2017-04-04
Storage Module With Stacking And Unstacking Functions App 20160257510 - CAMPAGNOLLE; Pierre ; et al.	2016-09-08
Unstacker device for a machine for sorting flat articles, and a method of unstacking flat articles Grant 8,583,275 - Dauvergne , et al. November 12, 2	2013-11-12
Flat-article feed device and a postal sorting machine Grant 8,480,072 - Samain , et al. July 9, 2	2013-07-09
Method of detecting open mailpieces such as non-wrapped magazines Grant 8,371,581 - Teluob , et al. February 12, 2	2013-02-12
Unstacker Device For A Machine For Sorting Flat Articles, And A Method Of Unstacking Flat Articles App 20130030563 - Dauvergne; Mickael ; et al.	2013-01-31
Postal sorting machine with a manual feed station Grant 8,267,243 - Ambroise , et al. September 18, 2	2012-09-18
Multi-mode unstacker device for unstacking mailpieces Grant 8,235,377 - Ambroise , et al. August 7, 2	2012-08-07
Device For Separating Flat Articles, A Corresponding Control Method, And A Corresponding Postal Machine App 20120013065 - Ambroise; Stephane ; et al.	2012-01-19
Flat-article Feed Device And A Postal Sorting Machine App 20120013064 - Samain; Stephane ; et al.	2012-01-19
Mailpiece conveyor device with servocontrol on reject rate Grant 8,042,692 - Ambroise October 25, 2	2011-10-25
Postal Sorting Machine With A Manual Feed Station App 20110186404 - Ambroise; Stephane ; et al.	2011-08-04
Deformable-wheel conveyor exerting a progressive pinching force Grant 7,987,967 - Abraham , et al. August 2, 2	2011-08-02
Method Of Detecting Open Mailpieces Such As Non-wrapped Magazines App 20110052362 - Teluob; Jean-Marc ; et al.	2011-03-03
Flat-article Feed Device With A Synchronizer Having A Plurality Of Motor Drives App 20110042275 - Samain; Stephane ; et al.	2011-02-24
Multi-Mode Unstacker Device for Unstacking Mailpieces App 20100329833 - Ambroise; Stephane ; et al.	2010-12-30
Deformable-Wheel Conveyor Exerting a Progressive Pinching Force App 20100170770 - Abraham; Daniel ; et al.	2010-07-08
A Mailpiece Conveyor Device With Servocontrol On Reject Rate App 20100170831 - Ambroise; Stephane	2010-07-08
Device for unstacking postal items with optimized management of unstacking conditions Grant 7,712,735 - Chorier-Pichon , et al. May 11, 2	2010-05-11
Device for Unstacking Postal Items with Optimized Management of Unstacking Conditions App 20080073827 - Chorier-Pichon; Pierre ; et al.	2008-03-27

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.