Amatech Corporation
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Amatech Corporation.The latest application filed is for "locking-cylinder supported surgical boot".
- Amatech Corporation - Acton ME
- Amatech Corporation - Concord MA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Locking-cylinder supported surgical boot Grant 6,058,534 - Navarro , et al. May 9, 2 | 2000-05-09 |
| Locking-cylinder supported surgical boot Grant 5,961,085 - Navarro , et al. October 5, 1 | 1999-10-05 |
| Leg holder system for simultaneous positioning in the abduction and lithotomy dimensions Grant 5,802,641 - Van Steenburg September 8, 1 | 1998-09-08 |
| Locking pivot assembly with both pivot and tilt axes Grant 4,898,491 - Van Steenburg February 6, 1 | 1990-02-06 |
| Convertible carriage Grant 4,736,959 - Van Steenburg April 12, 1 | 1988-04-12 |
| Armboard mounting assembly Grant 4,698,837 - Van Steenburg October 6, 1 | 1987-10-06 |
| NCAGE Code | 1ERB4 | AMATECH CORP |
| NCAGE Code | 5W381 | AMATECH CORP |
| CAGE Code | 1ERB4 | AMATECH CORPORATION ORDIRECT DIVISION OR ALLEN MEDICAL DIVISION |
| CAGE Code | 5W381 | AMATECH CORP |
| DUNS | 046300729 | AMATECH CORP |
| SEC | 0000796483 | AMATECH CORP |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 