loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Allen; James A..The latest application filed is for "conditioner assembly for a chemical mechanical polishing apparatus".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Conditioner assembly for a chemical mechanical polishing apparatus Grant 6,042,457 - Wilson , et al. March 28, 2 | 2000-03-28 |
Parkable grapple having quick attachment to loader holder Grant 5,639,205 - Kaczmarczyk , et al. June 17, 1 | 1997-06-17 |
Oxygen barrier resins Grant 4,965,314 - Lancaster , et al. October 23, 1 | 1990-10-23 |
Oxygen barrier resins Grant 4,910,253 - Lancaster , et al. March 20, 1 | 1990-03-20 |
Maleic anhydride grafts of olefin polymers Grant 4,684,576 - Tabor , et al. August 4, 1 | 1987-08-04 |
Blends of ethylene/acrylic acid copolymers with linear low density polyethylene Grant 4,678,836 - McKinney , et al. July 7, 1 | 1987-07-07 |
Anti-block additives for olefin polymers Grant 4,415,691 - Allen , et al. * November 15, 1 | 1983-11-15 |
Carriage translating apparatus for video disc player Grant 4,216,969 - Allen August 12, 1 | 1980-08-12 |
Video disc player having unitary record handling platform construction Grant 4,191,380 - Allen , et al. March 4, 1 | 1980-03-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.