loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Alferness; Rodney C..The latest application filed is for "non-blocking optical cross-connect structure for telecommunications network".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Non-blocking optical cross-connect structure for telecommunications network Grant 5,627,925 - Alferness , et al. May 6, 1 | 1997-05-06 |
Polarization-independent optical wavelength selective coupler Grant 5,495,543 - Alferness , et al. February 27, 1 | 1996-02-27 |
Tunable optical waveguide coupler Grant 5,253,314 - Alferness , et al. October 12, 1 | 1993-10-12 |
Asymmetric, periodically loaded waveguide for polarization rotation Grant 5,243,669 - Alferness , et al. September 7, 1 | 1993-09-07 |
Optical interconnect arrangement Grant 5,009,477 - Alferness , et al. April 23, 1 | 1991-04-23 |
Division multiplexing and demultiplexing means lightwave communication system comprising optical time Grant 4,991,975 - Alferness , et al. February 12, 1 | 1991-02-12 |
Wavelength tunable composite cavity laser Grant 4,955,028 - Alferness , et al. September 4, 1 | 1990-09-04 |
Grating coupler with monolithically integrated quantum well index modulator Grant 4,904,045 - Alferness , et al. February 27, 1 | 1990-02-27 |
Narrow-linewidth resonant optical device, transmitter, system, and method Grant 4,852,960 - Alferness , et al. August 1, 1 | 1989-08-01 |
Optical communications laser including a resonator filter Grant 4,826,282 - Alferness May 2, 1 | 1989-05-02 |
Optical waveguide resonator filters Grant 4,750,801 - Alferness June 14, 1 | 1988-06-14 |
Narrow-band wavelength selective optical coupler Grant 4,737,007 - Alferness , et al. April 12, 1 | 1988-04-12 |
Composite cavity laser utilizing an intra-cavity electrooptic waveguide device Grant 4,728,168 - Alferness , et al. March 1, 1 | 1988-03-01 |
Electrooptic polarization multiplexer/demultiplexer Grant 4,711,515 - Alferness December 8, 1 | 1987-12-08 |
Composite cavity laser utilizing an intra-cavity electrooptic waveguide device Grant 4,667,331 - Alferness , et al. May 19, 1 | 1987-05-19 |
Traveling wave electrooptic devices Grant 4,553,810 - Alferness , et al. November 19, 1 | 1985-11-19 |
Wavelength tunable TE to TM mode converter Grant 4,533,207 - Alferness August 6, 1 | 1985-08-06 |
Traveling wave, electrooptic devices with effective velocity matching Grant 4,448,479 - Alferness May 15, 1 | 1984-05-15 |
Method for manufacturing birefringent integrated optics devices Grant 4,400,052 - Alferness , et al. August 23, 1 | 1983-08-23 |
Tunable polarization independent wavelength filter Grant 4,390,236 - Alferness June 28, 1 | 1983-06-28 |
Polarization transformer Grant 4,384,760 - Alferness May 24, 1 | 1983-05-24 |
Velocity mismatched modulator Grant 4,381,139 - Alferness April 26, 1 | 1983-04-26 |
Optical waveguides in InGaAsP and InP Grant 4,376,138 - Alferness , et al. March 8, 1 | 1983-03-08 |
Optical wavelength filter Grant 4,273,411 - Alferness June 16, 1 | 1981-06-16 |
Polarization-independent optical directional coupler switch/modulator Grant 4,243,295 - Alferness January 6, 1 | 1981-01-06 |
Tunable optical waveguide directional coupler filter Grant 4,146,297 - Alferness , et al. March 27, 1 | 1979-03-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.