Albrecht; Mark R.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Albrecht; Mark R..The latest application filed is for "computer conferencing system and features".
- Albrecht; Mark R. - Hanover MA
- Albrecht; Mark R. - Stow OH
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Work flow systems and processes for outsourced financial services Grant 8,239,233 - Albrecht August 7, 2 | 2012-08-07 |
| Tax return outsourcing and systems for protecting data Grant 7,769,645 - Albrecht August 3, 2 | 2010-08-03 |
| Tax return outsourcing and systems for protecting data Grant 7,756,761 - Albrecht July 13, 2 | 2010-07-13 |
| Tax return outsourcing and systems for protecting data Grant 7,668,763 - Albrecht February 23, 2 | 2010-02-23 |
| Connector housing Grant D597,962 - Albrecht August 11, 2 | 2009-08-11 |
| Switch Grant D558,155 - Michaud , et al. December 25, 2 | 2007-12-25 |
| Computer conferencing system and features App 20070011234 - Albrecht; Mark R. | 2007-01-11 |
| Low profile, double pole safety switch and connector assembly Grant 6,207,910 - Harvey , et al. March 27, 2 | 2001-03-27 |
| Switch operated actuating device Grant 5,812,052 - Swanger , et al. September 22, 1 | 1998-09-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 