Agarwala; Poonam
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Agarwala; Poonam.The latest application filed is for "tens device with electronic pain intensity scale".
- Agarwala; Poonam - New Brighton MN
- Agarwala; Poonam - Brighton MN
- Agarwala; Poonam - St. Paul MN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| TENS device with electronic pain intensity scale Grant 6,044,303 - Agarwala , et al. March 28, 2 | 2000-03-28 |
| Externally worn medical device Grant 6,041,259 - Agarwala , et al. March 21, 2 | 2000-03-21 |
| Combined pelvic floor stimulation and electromyography device Grant D411,887 - Agarwala July 6, 1 | 1999-07-06 |
| Electronic pain feedback system and method Grant 5,873,900 - Maurer , et al. February 23, 1 | 1999-02-23 |
| Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator Grant D399,970 - Agarwala , et al. October 20, 1 | 1998-10-20 |
| Electronic pain feedback system and method Grant 5,653,739 - Maurer , et al. August 5, 1 | 1997-08-05 |
| Programmable functional electrical stimulation system Grant 4,622,973 - Agarwala * November 18, 1 | 1986-11-18 |
| Two-wire ballast for fluorescent tube dimming Grant 4,350,933 - Agarwala , et al. September 21, 1 | 1982-09-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 