Advanced Eye Protection IP Holding
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Advanced Eye Protection IP Holding.The latest application filed is for "snap-fit features in eyewear".
- Advanced Eye Protection IP Holding - Park City UT
Trademarks
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Snap-fit features in eyewear Grant 10,571,714 - Chen , et al. Feb | 2020-02-25 |
| Temple assemblies for eyewear Grant 10,185,158 - Chen Ja | 2019-01-22 |
| Snap-fit Features In Eyewear App 20180231797 - Chen; Stephen Charles ; et al. | 2018-08-16 |
| Temple Assemblies for Eyewear App 20170336652 - Chen; Stephen Charles | 2017-11-23 |
| Optical positioning aiming system Grant 9,791,699 - Chen October 17, 2 | 2017-10-17 |
| Wave-shaped temple insert Grant 9,726,905 - Chen August 8, 2 | 2017-08-08 |
| Optical Positioning Aiming System App 20160290764 - Chen; Stephen Charles | 2016-10-06 |
| Wave-shaped Temple Insert App 20150323808 - Chen; Stephen Charles | 2015-11-12 |
| Temple assembly for eyewear Grant 9,122,079 - Chen September 1, 2 | 2015-09-01 |
| Temple Assembly For Eyewear App 20140092358 - Chen; Stephen Charles | 2014-04-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 