Adamant Namiki Precision Jewel Co L T D
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Adamant Namiki Precision Jewel Co L T D. Adamant Namiki Precision Jewel Co L T D has 3 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "ORBRAY"
- Company Aliases
- ADAMANT NAMIKI PRECISION JEWEL CO., LTD.
- Adamant Namiki Precision Jewel Co., Ltd. - Tokyo JP
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| METHOD FOR COLLECTING LIVING TISSUE 20220298463 - 17/805592 MUTO; Hikaru | 2022-09-22 |
| CLUTCH DEVICE AND MOTOR UNIT 20220268321 - 17/743827 KOBAYASHI; Yasuyuki ; et al. | 2022-08-25 |
| OPTICAL PROPAGATION DEVICE 20220244451 - 17/727096 HORIGUCHI; Koji | 2022-08-04 |
| DENTAL IMPLANT BODY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DENTAL IMPLANT BODY 20220125557 - 17/647550 Muto; Hikaru ; et al. | 2022-04-28 |
| OPTICAL COUPLING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING OPTICAL COUPLING DEVICE 20220057579 - 17/519075 NAMEKAWA; Tsuyoshi ; et al. | 2022-02-24 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"ORBRAY" 79325967 |
ORBRAY 2021-05-31 |
"ADAMANT" 1923382 74487148 |
ADAMANT 1994-02-07 |
"NAMIKI" 1808874 74251441 |
NAMIKI 1992-03-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 