Achtnig; Klaus-Peter
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Achtnig; Klaus-Peter.The latest application filed is for "protective circuit and protective plug for telecommunication installations".
- Achtnig; Klaus-Peter - Berlin DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Protective circuit and protective plug for telecommunication installations Grant 5,299,088 - Honl , et al. March 29, 1 | 1994-03-29 |
| Voltage limiter arrangement with receiving member for connection to a surge arrester magazine Grant 5,172,295 - Hegner , et al. December 15, 1 | 1992-12-15 |
| Device for making a solderless, non-screwed and unstripped single or multiple contact at a terminal element Grant 4,533,196 - Forberg , et al. August 6, 1 | 1985-08-06 |
| Device for clamping an insulated cable wire to a terminal element Grant 4,412,374 - Forberg , et al. November 1, 1 | 1983-11-01 |
| Connector assembly for PCM cables Grant 4,405,187 - Muller , et al. September 20, 1 | 1983-09-20 |
| Overvoltage-arrester device for terminal- or junction blocks in telecommunication equipment Grant 4,345,294 - Forberg , et al. August 17, 1 | 1982-08-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 