Trademark applications and grants for Acer Incorporated. Acer Incorporated has 192 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "PREDATOR HELIOS"
State Incorporated | TAIWAN |
Entity Type | CORPORATION |
Address | Songshan Dist. 7F-5, No. 369, Fuxing N. Rd. Taipei City TAIWAN 10541 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
METHOD FOR WRITING DATA IN PARALLEL AND DATA STORAGE SYSTEM 20220308793 - 17/317907 Hou; Guan-Yu ;   et al. | 2022-09-29 |
DRIVING DEVICE AND DRIVING METHOD FOR ELECTRIC ASSISTED BICYCLE 20220306238 - 17/308051 Chen; Hao-Ming | 2022-09-29 |
STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAY DEVICE 20220299789 - 17/234812 Chiu; Yi-Jung ;   et al. | 2022-09-22 |
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING INTENSITY OF LOW-FREQUENCY CURRENT 20220296905 - 17/243539 Huang; Yi-Jin ;   et al. | 2022-09-22 |
METHOD FOR ESTIMATING VENTRICULAR VOLUME 20220296218 - 17/233563 Huang; Yi-Jin ;   et al. | 2022-09-22 |
NCAGE Code | SH686 | ACER INC |
NCAGE Code | S7010 | ACER INCORPORATED |
NCAGE Code | 6BSV0 | ACER INC. |
CAGE Code | 6BSV0 | ACER INC. |
CAGE Code | S7010 | ACER INCORPORATED |
CAGE Code | SH686 | ACER INC |
DUNS | 967508198 | ACER INC. |
SEC | 0001093632 | ACER INC of TAIWAN, PROVINCE OF CHIN |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.