ACACIA PHARMA LIMITED
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Acacia Pharma Limited. Acacia Pharma Limited has 6 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "BYFAVO"
- Company Aliases
- Acacia Pharma Limited
- Acacia Pharma Limited - Duxford GB
- Acacia Pharma Ltd. - Duxford GB
- Acacia Pharma Limited - Cambridge GB
- ACACIA PHARMA LTD - Duxford, Cambridge GB
| State Incorporated | ENGLAND AND WALES |
| Entity Type | PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY |
| Address | THE OFFICER'S MESS, ROYSTON ROAD, DUXFORD CAMBRIDGE UNITED KINGDOM CB224QH |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| USE OF AMISULPRIDE AS AN ANTI-EMETIC 20220296570 - 17/834000 GILBERT; Julian Clive ; et al. | 2022-09-22 |
| USE OF AMISULPRIDE AS AN ANTI-EMETIC 20210228543 - 17/013987 GILBERT; Julian Clive ; et al. | 2021-07-29 |
| USE OF AMISULPRIDE AS AN ANTI-EMETIC 20200093792 - 16/697986 GILBERT; Julian Clive ; et al. | 2020-03-26 |
| RESCUE TREATMENT OF POST OPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING 20200038369 - 16/485008 GILBERT; Julian Clive ; et al. | 2020-02-06 |
| THERAPY OF POST-OPERATIVE EMESIS WITH AMISULPRIDE 20190262310 - 16/346563 GILBERT; Julian Clive ; et al. | 2019-08-29 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 