Abbott Curtis
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Abbott Curtis. Abbott Curtis has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "MALLEABLE MICROSYSTEMS"
- Company Aliases
- Abbott, Curtis
- curtis abbott
- Abbott, Curtis - Menlo Park CA
- Abbott; Curtis - Menlo Park CA
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Programmable logic datapath that may be used in a field programmable device 20020063577 - 10/050496 Abbott, Curtis | 2002-05-30 |
| Count/address generation circuitry 6,601,158 - 09/475,647 Abbott , et al. July 29, 2 | 2003-07-29 |
| Programmable logic datapath that may be used in a field programmable device 6,531,888 - 10/050,496 Abbott March 11, 2 | 2003-03-11 |
| Sums of production datapath 6,438,569 - 09/399,981 Abbott August 20, 2 | 2002-08-20 |
| Programmable logic datapath that may be used in a field programmable device 6,351,142 - 09/609,912 Abbott February 26, 2 | 2002-02-26 |
| Multilevel logic field programmable device 6,150,836 - 09/346,556 Abbott November 21, 2 | 2000-11-21 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"MALLEABLE MICROSYSTEMS" 75292854 |
MALLEABLE MICROSYSTEMS 1997-05-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 