Trademark Filing
Beijing Dajia Internet Information Technology Co., Ltd.
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Beijing Dajia Internet Information Technology Co., Ltd. |
| Entity Statement | limited company (ltd.) |
| Address | Shangdi West Road, Haidian District Room 101D1-7,1st Floor, Building 1, No.6 Beijing CN 100085 |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | CN |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| DM0000 | The mark consists of an elliptical design composed of two interlocking, curved shapes. The top shape transitions from green to blue then to yellow, while the bottom shape transitions from blue to green then to yellow, creating a gradient effect. The two shapes overlap in the center, forming an ellipse. The color white represents background and is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | 2024-06-22 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 