BRIDGE B DIRECT

Basic Fun, Inc.

Application Filed: 2022-10-21

Trademark Application Details

The mark consists of the terms "Bridge Direct" in large font. Between "Bridge" and "Direct" is a large stylized "B" within a circle.

Mark For: BRIDGE B DIRECT™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of business services, namely, combined strategic goods or services sourcing and cooperative purchasing for others; wholesale ordering services featuring a variety of consumer goods of others; business management consultancy services relating to consumer product distribution, logistics, reverse logistics, supply chain and consumer product distribution solutions; business advisory services relating to the selection of source suppliers for others in the fields of a wide variety of consumer goods; distributorship services in the fields of a wide variety of consumer goods of others.

Status

2022-10-25 UTC

LIVE APPLICATION Awaiting Examination

The trademark application has been accepted by the Office (has met the minimum filing requirements) and has not yet been assigned to an examiner.

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	97642538
Mark Literal Elements	BRIDGE B DIRECT
Mark Drawing Type	-
Mark Type	Service Mark
Standard Character Claim	No
Current Location	NEW APPLICATION PROCESSING 2022-10-25
Basis	1(a)
Class Status	ACTIVE
Primary US Classes	100: Miscellaneous 101: Advertising and Business 102: Insurance and Financial
Primary International Class	035 - Primary Class (Advertising and business) Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions.
Filed Use	Yes
Current Use	Yes
Intent To Use	No
Filed ITU	No
44D Filed	No
44E Current	No
66A Current	No
Current Basis	No
No Basis	No
Attorney Name	Adam S. Weiss
Attorney Docket Number	073875743408

Timeline

2010-10-30	Date of First Use
2010-10-30	Date of Use In Commerce
2022-10-21	Application Filed
2022-10-25	Location: NEW APPLICATION PROCESSING
2022-10-25	Status: Live/Pending
2022-10-25	Status: New application awaiting assignment to an examining attorney. See current trademark processing wait times for more information.
2022-10-25	Transaction Date

Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)

Party:	BASIC FUN, INC.
Address	Suite 4200 301 YAMATO RD. BOCA RATON, FLORIDA UNITED STATES 33431
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	DELAWARE

Documents

Application		2022-10-21
Drawing		2022-10-21
Specimen		2022-10-21

Design Search Codes

260117	Circles, two concentric; Concentric circles, two; Two concentric circles
260118	Circles, three or more concentric; Concentric circles, three or more; Three or more concentric circles
260121	Circles that are totally or partially shaded.

Attorney of Record

ADAM S. WEISS
POLSINELLI PC
PO BOX 140310
KANSAS CITY, MO 64114-0310

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	35
U.S. Codes:	100,101,102

Type Code	Type
DM0000	The mark consists of the terms "Bridge Direct" in large font. Between "Bridge" and "Direct" is a large stylized "B" within a circle.
DM0000	The mark consists of the terms "Bridge Direct" in large font. Between "Bridge" and "Direct" is a large stylized "B" within a circle.

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Proceeding Number
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM	2022-10-25

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.