To: | Solutions Organization, LLC (rick@rctrademark.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90977121 - STEM PLAYER - STEM001TMUS |
Sent: | May 13, 2022 10:40:38 AM |
Sent As: | ecom101@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 Attachment - 11 Attachment - 12 Attachment - 13 Attachment - 14 Attachment - 15 Attachment - 16 Attachment - 17 Attachment - 18 Attachment - 19 Attachment - 20 Attachment - 21 Attachment - 22 Attachment - 23 Attachment - 24 Attachment - 25 Attachment - 26 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90977121
Mark: STEM PLAYER
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Solutions Organization, LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. STEM001TMUS
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: May 13, 2022
The application is suspended for the reason(s) specified below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
The pending application(s) below has an earlier filing date or effective filing date than applicant’s application. If the mark in the application(s) below registers, the USPTO may refuse registration of applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark(s). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §1208.02(c). Action on this application is suspended until the prior-filed application(s) below either registers or abandons. 37 C.F.R. §2.83(c). Information relevant to the application(s) below is provided in this letter.
- U.S. Application Serial No(s). 88705284 and 88702062
Suspension process. The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended. See TMEP §716.04. As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension. TMEP §716.05.
No response required. Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so.
The amendment to the identification of goods is acceptable.
The refusal because the applied-for mark merely describes a characteristic and feature of applicant’s goods and/or services is continued.
The attached evidence from http://www.izotope.com/en/blog/music-production/stems-and-multitracks-whats-the-difference.html, http://www.subaqueousmusic.com/creating-stems-in-ableton-live/, and http://djbooth.net/pro-audio/the-best-places-to-find-stems-for-your-set shows that the wording “STEM” is commonly used in reference to a type of audio file. In relation to the applicant’s goods, the wording “STEMS” is descriptive because the applicant is providing software for creating and editing music stem files.
The term “PLAYER” is defined as “device that plays or controls the playing of audio or video recordings”. See American Heritage Dictionary Definition attached. In relation to applicant’s goods, the term “PLAYER” is merely descriptive because applicant’s software is used to create music.
When combined, the phrase “STEM MAKER” immediately describes to consumers a feature of applicant’s goods because applicant is providing software for sound manipulation including creating and editing music and audio stem files.
/Robert Clark/
Robert Clark
Examining Attorney
Law Office 101
571-272-9144
Robert.Clark@uspto.gov