To: | The Royalty Family, Inc. (spopp@losmp.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90573144 - THE ROYALTY FAMILY - 2000-001.03- |
Sent: | January 13, 2022 02:01:19 PM |
Sent As: | ecom106@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90573144
Mark: THE ROYALTY FAMILY
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: The Royalty Family, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 2000-001.03-
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: January 13, 2022
This Office Action is in response to applicant’s correspondence dated 12/28/21.
The following requirement is withdrawn: 1) Mark Description.
Applicant should note the following:
New Issue – Identification Amendment Exceeds Scope of Services in Original Application
In this case, the application originally identified the goods and/or services as follows: “On-line advertising and marketing services” in Class 35, and “Electronic transmission and streaming of digital media content for others via global and local computer networks” in Class 38.
However, the proposed amendment added the following services in Class 41: “Entertainment services in the nature of production of multimedia entertainment content.”
This proposed amendment is beyond the scope of the original identification because “Entertainment services in the nature of production of multimedia entertainment content” was not included in the original identification. Thus, the amendment is not acceptable.
Specimen
The applicant’s arguments are unpersuasive, and the requirement for an acceptable specimen is continued. For Class 35, applicant has not provided any evidence that it is offering advertising services to others. There is no reference to applicant enticing third parties to advertise or market products/services through applicant’s programs. For Class 38, any transmission or streaming is by Google through its YouTube platform. Just because an applicant is conducting an internet-based activity or rendering a service that involves electronic transmission of data, the applicant’s service is not automatically considered a telecommunications service in Class 38. See TMEP §1402.11(a)(iii). In this case, applicant itself is not providing the transmission or streaming service.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Tejbir Singh/
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 106
571-272-5878
571-273-9106 (fax)
Tejbir.Singh@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE