To: | Paper Supply Station, LLC (amanda@1801andco.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90555076 - 1801ANDCO - N/A |
Sent: | September 17, 2021 12:49:12 PM |
Sent As: | ecom119@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90555076
Mark: 1801ANDCO
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Paper Supply Station, LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
COMBINED EXAMINER’S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: September 17, 2021
USPTO database searched; no conflicting marks found. The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.
Applicant must address issues shown below. On September 17, 2021, the examining attorney and Amanda N. Cameron, CEO of applicant discussed the issues below. Applicant must timely respond to these issues. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); TMEP §708.05.
Application Refused—Section 1(a)--Specimen Does Not Indicate Use in Relation to the Identified Goods
An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark in use in commerce for each international class of goods and/or services identified in the application or amendment to allege use. 15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(1); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a). The current specimen(s) do not demonstrate proper use of the proposed mark in relation to the goods specified in the application.
Section 45 of the Trademark Act requires use of the mark “on the goods, their containers or the displays associated therewith, or on the tags or labels affixed thereto”. 15 U.S.C. §1127; TMEP §§901.01, 904.03. Material that functions merely to tell the prospective purchaser about the goods, or to promote the sale of the goods, is not acceptable to support trademark use. Similarly, leaflets, handbills, brochures, advertising circulars and other printed advertising material or informational inserts are generally not acceptable to show trademark use. In re MediaShare Corp., 43 USPQ2d 1304 (TTAB 1997); In re Schiapparelli Searle, 26 USPQ2d 1520 (TTAB 1993); In re Drilco Industrial Inc., 15 USPQ2d 1671 (TTAB 1990); In re ITT Rayonier Inc., 208 USPQ 86 (TTAB 1980); In re Bright of America, Inc., 205 USPQ 63 (TTAB 1979); TMEP 904.04(b). However, an instruction sheet may be an acceptable specimen. In re Ultraflight Inc., 221 USPQ 903 (TTAB 1984); TMEP §§904.04(b), (c), 1301.04.
In this case, the specimen consists of a photograph of a calendar. However, the proposed mark “1801ANDCO” is used on the specimen only as an internet address where the applicant can be contacted. TMEP §1215.02(a). The specimen does not show the proposed mark used as a label for, or indicator of source of, the proposed goods. TMEP §§904.03, 904.04(b)-(c). Accordingly, registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark in use in commerce in connection with any of the goods specified in the application or amendment to allege use. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); In re Graystone Consulting Assocs., Inc., 115 USPQ2d 2035, 2037-38 (TTAB 2015); In re Chengdu AOBI Info. Tech. Co., 111 USPQ2d 2080, 2081-82 (TTAB 2011); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).
(1) Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) was in actual use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of an amendment to allege use and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for the goods and/or services identified in the application or amendment to allege use. A “verified substitute specimen” is a specimen that is accompanied by the following statement made in a signed affidavit or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of the amendment to allege use.” The substitute specimen cannot be accepted without this statement.
Examples of specimens. Specimens for goods include a photograph of (1) the actual goods bearing the mark; (2) an actual container, packaging, tag or label for the goods bearing the mark; or (3) a point-of-sale display showing the mark directly associated with the goods. See 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1), (c); TMEP §904.03(a)-(m). Leaflets, handbills, advertising circulars, and other advertising materials are generally not acceptable specimens for goods. See TMEP §§904.03 et seq. A webpage specimen submitted as a display associated with the goods must show the mark in association with a picture or textual description of the goods and include information necessary for ordering the goods. TMEP §904.03(i); see 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1), (c). Please Note: Any webpage printout or screenshot submitted as a specimen must include the webpage’s URL and the date it was accessed or printed. 37 C.F.R. §2.56(c).
(2) Amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b) (which includes withdrawing an amendment to allege use, if one was filed), as no specimen is required before publication. This option will later necessitate additional fee(s) and filing requirements, including a specimen.
For an overview of the response options referenced above and instructions on how to satisfy these options using the online Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Specimen webpage.
Application has been amended as shown below. As agreed to by the individual identified in the Priority Action section, the examining attorney has amended the application as shown below. Please notify the examining attorney immediately of any objections. TMEP §707. In addition, applicant is advised that amendments to the goods and/or services are permitted only if they clarify or limit them; amendments that add to or broaden the scope of the goods and/or services are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a).
Statement Concerning the Applicant’s Name, Entity Type and Citizenship
The application is amended to indicate that the applicant is Paper Supply Station, LLC a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, doing business as “1801&CO.”. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(3)(ii)-(iv); TMEP §§803.03 et seq., 803.04.
Amendment of the Identification of Goods for International Class 016
The identification of goods for International Class 016 is amended to read as follows:
Printed wall calendars made of acrylic.
See TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.01(e).
Applicant’s Response
There is no required format or form for responding to an Office action. For this application to proceed further, the applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement raised in this Office action. If the action includes a refusal, the applicant may provide arguments and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and the mark should register. The applicant may also have other options specified in this Office action for responding to a refusal and should consider those options carefully. To respond to requirements and certain refusal response options, the applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or statements. For more information and general tips on responding to USPTO Office actions, response options, and how to file a response online, Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” on the USPTO’s website.
If the applicant does not respond to this Office action within six months of the issue/mailing date, or responds by expressly abandoning the application, the application process will end and the trademark will fail to register. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.65(a), 2.68(a); TMEP §§718.01, 718.02. Additionally, the USPTO will not refund the application filing fee, which is a required processing fee. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(i)-(iv), 2.209(a); TMEP §405.04.
When an application has abandoned for failure to respond to an Office action, an applicant may timely file a petition to revive the application, which, if granted, would allow the application to return to active status. See 37 C.F.R. §2.66; TMEP §1714. The petition must be filed within two months of the date of issuance of the notice of abandonment and may be filed online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) with a $100 fee. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(15)(ii), 2.66(a)(1), (b)(1)
Responses to Office actions must be properly signed. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(b), 2.193(e)(2); TMEP §§712, 712.01. If an applicant is not represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney, the response must be signed by the individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant (e.g., a corporate officer or general partner). See 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(2)(ii); TMEP §§611.03(b), 611.06(b)-(h), 712.01. In the case of joint applicants, all must sign. 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(2)(ii); TMEP §611.06(a).
If an applicant is represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney authorized to practice before the USPTO, the attorney must sign the response. 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(2)(i); TMEP §§611.03(b), 712.01. The only attorneys who may sign responses are (1) attorneys in good standing with a bar of the highest court of any U.S. state or territory, or (2) Canadian trademark attorneys or agents reciprocally recognized by the USPTO’s Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED) who are appointed in connection with a U.S.-licensed attorney. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(a), 11.14(a), (c), (e). Foreign attorneys, other than recognized Canadian trademark attorneys or agents, do not have authority to sign responses. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(e), 11.14(c)(1), (e). If an applicant is initially represented by an attorney, and then later retains another U.S.-licensed attorney from a different firm, the newly retained attorney may not sign responses until the applicant files a new power and/or revocation of attorney. See 37 C.F.R. §2.18(a)(7); TMEP §604.03. Please Note: In all cases, the signer must be identified by first and last name and title or position. 37 C.F.R. §2.193(d).
If the applicant has technical questions about the TEAS response to Office action form, applicant can review the electronic filing tips available online at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eFilingTips.htm and email technical questions to TEAS@uspto.gov.
If the applicant or its appointed attorney has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
/Michael Tanner/
Michael Tanner
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 119
Telephone: 571-272-9706
Email: Michael.Tanner@uspto.gov
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
RESPONSE GUIDANCE