To: | Flatiron Health, Inc. (suzann@themoskowitzfirm.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90527537 - SPOTLIGHT - 558 |
Sent: | September 09, 2021 05:08:16 PM |
Sent As: | ecom113@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90527537
Mark: SPOTLIGHT
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: Flatiron Health, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 558
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: September 09, 2021
SEARCH OF USPTO DATABASE OF MARKS
POTENTIAL SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL – ONE PENDING APPLICATION
In response to this Office action, applicant may present arguments in support of registration by addressing the issue of the potential conflict between applicant’s mark and the mark in the referenced application. Applicant’s election not to submit arguments at this time in no way limits applicant’s right to address this issue later if a refusal under Section 2(d) issues.
While applicant is not required to respond to the issue of the pending application, applicant must respond to the requirements below within six months of the mailing date of this Office action to avoid abandonment.
IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICES UNACCEPTABLE – AMENDMENT REQUIRED
An application must specify, in an explicit manner, the particular goods or services on or in connection with which the applicant uses, or has a bona fide intention to use, the mark in commerce. See 15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(2), (b)(2); 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. Therefore, applicant should replace the forward slash in the identification of services, if appropriate, or rewrite the identification with the forward slash deleted and services specified using definite and unambiguous language.
Finally, the identification of services contains parentheses. Generally, an applicant should not use parentheses and brackets, including curly brackets, in identifications in order to avoid confusion with the USPTO’s practice of using parentheses and brackets in registrations to indicate (1) goods and/or services that have been deleted from registrations, (2) goods and/or services not claimed in an affidavit of incontestability, or (3) guidance to users of the USPTO’s U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual to draft an acceptable identification. See TMEP §§1402.04, 1402.12. The only exception for including parenthetical information in identifications is if it serves to explain or translate the matter immediately preceding the parenthetical phrase in such a way that it does not affect the clarity or scope of the identification, e.g., “fried tofu pieces (abura-age).” See TMEP §1402.12.
Therefore, applicant must remove the parentheses from the identification and incorporate any parenthetical or bracketed information into the description of the services.
Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate (amendments emphasized):
Class 35: Consulting in the field of life sciences research, namely supporting custom observational evidence generation, and
providing end-to-end services including: scoping support to understand research objectives and how to leverage real world data, identification of targeted patient cohorts, derivation of variables
(including outcomes, events, treatments, disease/patient characteristics, procedures), curation of custom data and analytic deliverables, and organizational support related to postdelivery
publication and communication of findings
Class 42: Consulting in the field of life sciences research, namely supporting custom observational evidence generation, and
providing end-to-end services, namely including: scoping support to understand research objectives and how to leverage real world data,
identification of targeted patient cohorts, derivation of variables, namely, (including outcomes, events, treatments, disease and /patient
characteristics, procedures), curation of custom data and analytic deliverables, and organizational support related to postdelivery publication and communication of findings
TMEP §1402.01
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each requirement in this Office action. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
If the applicant has any questions or needs further assistance, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Elena Kravtsoff/
Elena Kravtsoff
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 113, USPTO
(571) 272-3233
elena.kravtsoff@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE