To: | Yang,Chen (jmlawchina@gmail.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90385286 - GQJQ - yoomarks |
Sent: | June 10, 2021 09:05:58 AM |
Sent As: | ecom117@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90385286
Mark: GQJQ
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Yang,Chen
|
|
Reference/Docket No. yoomarks
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: June 10, 2021
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
Database Search. The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.
REQUIREMENT FOR ADDITIONAL SPECIMENS
Given the wide range of goods identified in the application, and the nature of the specimens of record, the examining attorney requires additional specimens of use in this case to allow for a complete and accurate examination, and to assess the registrability of the applied-for mark. 37 C.F.R. §§2.56(a), 2.61(b), 2.86(a)(3); TMEP §§814, 904.01(a), 1402.03.
The applicant must provide at least one specimen from each of the following groups of goods:
That is, the applicant is expected to provide at least 8 different specimens showing at least one good from each grouping noted above.
If applicant is unable to provide specimens to support use of one or more categories of goods, the applicant must delete these entries, or amend the filing basis for those goods that were not in use as of the application filing date to an intent to use basis under Section 1(b). This option will later necessitate additional fees and filing requirements such as providing a specimen for these goods at a subsequent date.
Failure to provide the required additional specimens is grounds for refusing registration. In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814.
Applicant should also note the following advisory.
LIVING INDIVIDUAL STATEMENT DELETED AS UNNECESSARY
No statement should be printed unless the name or portrait might reasonably be perceived as that of a specific living individual. This is true even if the applicant submits an unsolicited statement that a particular name or portrait does not identify a living individual. See TMEP §1206.05.
Nothing in the mark might reasonably be perceived as that of a specific living individual. As such, the negative living individual statement submitted by applicant has been deleted.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
Becker, Joseph (Trademark)
/Joseph Becker/
Trademark Examining Attorney, Law Office 117
United States PTO
(571) 270-5493
Joseph.Becker1@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE